top
BLOODLINES
OfThe Patriarchs
By J.D. Self .Preface:The BirthrightIn Gen 24:3,4 Abraham makes sure that Isaac marries one of his (Abraham's) people.
Isaac had paternal twin boys, Esau and Jacob, by Rebecca (Gen 25:24-6). Esau lost his birthright (Gen 27). Now it can be argued that this happened because of his carelessness about it (Gen 26:33) -- he gave it to Jacob for a good meal; Or, he lost his birthright because Rebecca favored Jacob (Gen 25:28), and took advantage of Isaac's infirmity (Gen 27:1) -- she conspired with Jacob to deceived Isaac (Gen 27).
But, why would she do that? – Oh yes, she did it!!! ... but why? ... Maybe Esau's carelessness betokened some deeper flaw that Rebecca saw ...
Marriage Instructions
After Isaac found out what had happened, and he knew Jacob had the birthright, Isaac told him NOT to marry a Canaanite, but to marry his cousin (Gen 28:1,2). Now why did he say that? (The implications of such a statement are Politically Incorrect, today.)
Looking back in Genesis we can see what bearing this concern had on the progenitors of God’s People: This is the one thing in common between the marriage instructions given by both Abraham and Isaac to their respective sons.
Now we notice, by the way, that Esau had married Hittite girls (Gen 26:34) -- Canaanites, and twice the Scriptures say that this marriage to Hittites, “the daughters of Heth,” grieved Isaac and Rebecca: 26:35, and 27:46. That marriage was BEFORE he actually lost the birthright (Gen 27). THAT FACT is especially interesting because it goes against the instructions of Isaac to the unmarried Jacob.
Could this have been the determining factor, that God allowed Jacob to get the birthright even by deceit?
The marriage instructions of the first two patriarchs of God's chosen race bore directly on the subsequent BLOODLINES of the race. Are BLOODLINES - genetics - important to God?
The Gospels
The human lineage of Jesus Christ is recounted in the Gospel of St. Matthew (Matt 1:1-17) and the Gospel of St. Luke (3:21-38) to prove that Jesus was of David's line, but with the lesson (above) from the Old Testament can’t we draw a more general conclusion about the purpose of these passages? Or, should we be Politically Correct ...? Can we, in all honesty, pretend that God did NOT mean to show Jesus' pure blood? ... Our modern clergy can. Under the influence of "modern social norms" (Antichrist Law), today’s clergy deny the obvious... (Remember, DENIAL, when associated with a lying spirit, is a manifestation of neurosis. And, that neurosis is a product or result of “Doublemindedness.”)
But isn't that the way of God, to put two or three lessons in the same event of Scripture. That the recitation of Jesus' ancestry appears in two Gospels obviously means that it is important to the Holy Spirit of God who inspired these writings.
Sins of Jesus' Ancestors
Genesis 38:1,2 tells us that Judah left home and married a Canaanite girl. And Gen 38:16 tells that Judah had relations with his widowed daughter-in-law who was disguised as a prostitute. From this union, verses 27-30 tell of the birth of twins: ILLEGITIMATE sons, Perez and Zerah.
The obvious question is: Why would God allow a BASTARD to be in Jesus heritage?
Add that to the question: Why would God allow Jacob and Rebecca, the deceivers of Isaac, to be rewarded with the inheritance of the birthright? (Deception rewarded? ...)
It was by way of Perez, that David, and Jesus were pure blooded Judahites (pure Israelites, of tribe, Judah) despite the fact that Judah, himself, married a foreigner, even a Canaanite. (Most of the tribe of Judah were of mixed, corrupted blood.) Notwithstanding Judah’s marriage, God kept the blood pure: to this same end Ezra and Nehemiah did service.
Given the recitation of Jesus' ancestry in two Gospels and the other foregoing evidence one logical conclusion answers those questions in a way consistent with that foregoing evidence:
God values the PURITY of BLOODLINES, highly indeed.
Purity of BLOODLINES and MORALITY * * *
Preventing the corruption of the blood, ie. the genes, or preventing the corruption of the race is more important than the "reputation", or outward appearances; Indeed, morality has race, survival of the race, and integrity of the race as its first object. The “feel good” purposes of morality are secondary. For example, “Women and children” go into the lifeboats, first, because there is the future of the race.
Again, God allowed illegitimacy, and deceit before the corruption of Jesus' blood. Moreover, allowing such to be recorded, indeed, insuring that such would be recorded in the Bible means that this preference of God was meant to be instructive to us. Just as it was no accident that Jesus' lineage was recorded in two Gospels, so it was no accident that illegitimacy and deceit were part of the story of his heritage.
Suffer the Little Children
How many children in Sunday school are uncomfortable to hear the story of how Rebecca and Jacob deceived Isaac and, as it were, cheated Esau of his birthright? I think, nearly everyone, young and old, alike, who hears or reads that story is confused by it. ... For lack of scholarly teachers.
My friends, my explanation of the deceit and illegitimacy is even more profoundly correct than would appear, heretofore: for, not only did God allow these things to take place, but these "sins" absolutely had to take place, given their circumstances, or else Jesus' blood would unavoidably be corrupted with Canaanite Blood.
Given Esau's primacy of birth, and his marriage, deceit (or illegitimacy) was the only way to preserve the integrity of the BLOODLINE of our Savior. And, given Judah's marriage illegitimacy was, again, the only way to give Jesus UNCORRUPTED GENES. (The Bible contains God's instructions and examples for us: The miraculous birth of our Lord is irrelavant to the Biblical instructions, here discerned.)
How many people, today, let alone Christians, are taught the importance of pure genes?.. ... None - on the contrary... As I said, everyone, young and old, alike, who hears or reads these stories is confused BECAUSE the premises or principles that we are taught obviate God’s Lesson for us, that preservation of race is paramount.
Although for centuries BLOODLINES were a fair consideration in the evaluation of a potential mate, in the modern world, especially since the 1960s, such a consideration is not only taboo, but actually "sinful" - by "modern social norms” - today's so called "standards." -- The Antibiblical, Antichrist values of today developed slowly after forced integration. (See Complete Biblical/Spiritual Interpretation of History...: )
Judeo/Christian Error
Today, Christians and everyone else who watches TV and goes to school, outside the home, is brainwashed into abiding 'anti-standards and beliefs' -- the opposite of what is natural, virtuous, and the will of God.
The Church is infiltrated. When confronted with the words of the Bible concerning race the deceived Christian, ie. Judeo/Christian says:
"I don't care what the that says!!! -- I know what I feel in my heart."..But that is only the average member of the deceived church.Look at what a pastor of the church wrote in an email discussion:
“The brain is said to be about 18 inches above the heart. What a great pity so many who seek to enter (the Kingdom) by intellect and high knowledge will come eternally, horribly short by mere inches. What a lesser pity that all of them and their neighbors could so enjoy that intellect if driven by the spirit within.”In His Royal Service,
Jim Campbell
My response:Jim erroneously equates the "Spirit" with the heart. The heart of man is NOT the heart of God."My ways are not your ways..."* (Ref: Prov 14:12)On the other hand, the Spirit can move the heart, ... but NOT by focusing on the heart so that we end up thinking as a woman would think. (That's what this Jack-ass, Jim Campbell, is trying to teach us: To Think Like Women -- because Antichrist has the Spirit of Jezebel.)(Don't get me wrong: I am NOT condemning women. Women are as God made them which is perfect for their duties... The heart centered thinking is exactly what is required of motherhood...)"My son, give me thine heart, and let thine eyes observe my ways." (Prov 23:26)* The Essence of the Bible: (Do a Bible search for "My Ways.")
“… Blessed are they (individually and nationally) that keep My Ways.” (Prov 8:32)
"All the ways of a man are clean in his own eyes; but the LORD weigheth the spirits."(Prov 16:2)
Women are to be under the "cover of Godly men," and are not to be in charge because,
"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked..." (Jer 17:9)
So, when our Pastors teach "The Heart, the heart, the heart" THEY AID THE DECEIVERS ... When women become the head of the house, or when men leave the Word of God, the "head of the house" becomes at best a prostitute (Ref: Jer 3:1), and at worst an evil murderer; for, the Spirit of Jezebel reigns. Remember, the nation is the wife of God. So, men too take on feminine characteristics when outside the Will (Law) of God. (Look at Politicians.)
"Cursed be the man that trustest in man, and ... whose heart departeth from the LORD." (v.5)
Again,… "The heart of man 'on its own' is deceitful above all things,...""... Let the heart cheer thee in the days of thy youth, and walk in the ways of thine heart,... But know thou, that for all these things God will bring thee into judgement." (Ecc 11:9)
What do the Sheep need?... True Pastors... The LORD declares:"I will give you shepherds AFTER MY OWN HEART,
who will lead you with KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING." (Jer 3:15)
I continued my email response: The EndTimesDiscussion (group) thinks I RANT AND RAVE too much...Why am I so intense? ...
Because I am with the Spirit: I have heard the Trumpet of (Spiritual) War:"My heart pounds... I cannot keep silent.
For I have heard the sound of the trumpet;
I have heard the Battle Cry...
MY PEOPLE ARE FOOLS."(Jer 4:19-22)ONLY GOD'S HEART is good. Scripture interprets Scripture...
Spiritually, "there is nothing new under the sun..." (Ecc 1:8) ... Prophecies must repeat even as the cycle of Blessings, Falling Away, and Judgement of Israel in the Book of Judges repeated.
"...All the nations ("Company of nations" promised to Jacob) shall be gathered unto it (JerUSAlem), to the name of the LORD (YHWH) ...:neither shall they walk any more after the imagination of their EVIL HEART." (Jer 3:17)
Note: What do you think the response was to my devastating argument?? ... "Did you really hear trumpets??" ...That is typical of the mental illness manifested in "DENIAL." Or, evidence of how the simplistic "Literal Interpretation" dogma can blind people. By the way:
What is needed to understand Scripture is Spiritual Discernment, not simplistic dogmas...
While we're on the subject, do you , the reader, think Jeremiah really heard trumpets? ... NO!!! He was writing spiritually: When God gives UNDERSTANDING, which is "prophecy," in a generic sense; When God Gives metaphysical vision which is penetrating understanding it causes rejoicing in the heart and lifts the spirit, even as a trumpet fanfare ...
Moses Ethiopian WifeTo prove that all our fore-fathers up to the Twentieth Century have been wrong the deceived church fathers, of today, will bring up the story of Moses marrying the Ethiopian.
My immediate reaction is, “... But was Moses sinless?” Was he Jesus Christ? What were the "sins of Solomon?" Solomon too committed the SIN OF INTERMARRIAGE, which led to the schism. (1 Kings 11:11) Neither of them was Jesus Christ. My point is: the “sin of intermarriage” was a sin.
Finally, what is the whole thrust of the Bible but a story of a chosen race enjoined to preserve its racial heritage which is only possible by maintaining racial purity. (Gen 5:1; 6:9, etc.)
"This is the Book of the generations* of Adam..." (5:1)"Ethiopian" in Strong's Exhaustive Concordance is the word for Cushite."Noah was a just man, and perfect in all his generations.*" (6:9)
"They have... mingled the Holy Race with the peoples around them." (Ezra 9:2)
* "Generations" is rooted in genes; "Perfect Generations" denotes pure genes, eg. racial purity.
Note: There is one dogma that should be followed; ... It is simple, but it is NOT simplistic: Scripture must be interpretted in such a way that it is INTERNALLY CONSISTANT. (The corollary of this is: "Scripture interprets Scripture.")
So, Moses married a member of the Cush line.
This is quite different from the implication of "Ethiopian," today, ie. Black African.So, in fact, then, Moses did not do what the BaalWorshipping Preachers of the Judeo/Christian (counterfeit) Church are trying to justify:: He, a white man, did not marry a Black woman. Yet, that is precisely what the Baal Worshippers want to justify, today, BECAUSE that is what Antichrist wants to promote, above all else.
These conclusions about race are deliberately misinterpretted by the deceivers (and the deceived) to imply hatred. It does NOT imply hatred except where Satan has infiltrated to create that hatred.(To wish to promote the interest of one's race need not imply hatred of other races. Competition with a Christian Spirit will not devolve into hatred. Without the Christian Spirit it degenerates into what the Power of the Air would have:
(It is the enemy that has taken the formerly neutral word, "racism", and made a pejorative of it. And the thrust of the pejorative tells us something about who Satan hates: the word, racism is only applied to Satan's enemy, God's chosen people, the Christian Race, the white race.) [See -- click (P.C.)2 ]
So, what of the position set forth in this paper? ...
What is the Spirit with which I "reason together" with the LORD, the Spirit of the Word? ... Let’s see ...“And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses
because of the Ethiopian woman
whom he had married...” (Num 12:1)
It looks like Miriam and Aaron were doing the same thing Ezra did, centuries later. But, the Lord rebuked them:“And the anger of the LORD was kindled against them ...” (v.9)
So, what is going on, here? ... My intellectual response, above, was given in the Spirit of the Word of God, but Lo!!! And Behold, there is more ..."Ethiopian" (Num 12:1) is word #3569 in Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance.
3569. Kuwshiy, koo-shee’; Patron, from 3568;a Cushite, or desc. Of Cush;- Cushi, Cushite, Ethiopian (-s)3568. Kuwsh, koosh; ¼ Cush (or Ethiopia),the name of the son of Ham,and of his territory3568. Kuwsh, koosh; ... Cush (or Ethiopia),the name of the son of Ham, and of his territory
So, ... “Come now, let us reason together, saith the LORD: ...” (Isah 1:18)
Academically speaking, it looks like Moses married a Child of Cush, the son of Ham which would make her of the Adamic Race. This conclusion would keep Moses within God’s Law, and within the biblical Definition of the Bible, itself, quoted, above: Genesis 5:1.But, to defend the indefensible lie, the “modern clergy” will focus on #3568 “and of his territory.” ... Yes there probably were Negroids living in Ethiopia, but to insist that Moses married a Black despite the arguments set forth, herein, is intellectual dishonesty. ... It serves an"agenda," the Antichrist agenda: They attacked Thomas Jefferson with similar lies for the purpose of reducing the stigma, and so increasing the occurance of miscengenation. (Everything the Antichrist(s) do, and every purpose they have is to destroy God's Kingdom by destroying God's People -- though their propaganda is so powerful that few can recognize their real purposes.)
God's rebuke of Miriam and Aaron makes more sense if he married a Cushite, rather than a non-adamite. Granted, God knew that He wanted Moses to lead Israel, and maybe the spirit behind the criticism was resentful. The spirit behind the enforcement of the Law is all important. Refer to Prov 16:2, quoted above.
Addendum: International Church??
Let’s see what the intellectually honest and righteous interpretation of another passage of Scripture yields: When Isaiah says,"...my house will be called a house for all nations" (Isa. 56:7), the modern “Baal Priests” who seek to sanctify whatever (P.C.) the World believes; they will say that the church should look like the United Nations. They say that, because they deliberately ignore one of the premises of the Bible, as it were: “This is the Book of the Generations of Adam.” (Gen 5:1) (Ref: Word #119, Strong's.) Or, they don’t ignore it, but they misinterpret it because the refuse to see, first, what Adam means, and second, that no one can be “father” of all races. It is genetically impossible.
The United States was a "house" of all Christian, ie. European, nations, eg. "All Nations...," before the creation of the United Nations. In fact, a clear slide into the morass began with the imposition of Antichrist Law upon this nation in 1949. The Declaration of "Separation of Church and State" fundamentally changed the Spirit behind the First Amendment while using words that seemed correct -- and were correct when they had a Christian Spirit behind them. This is discussed at length in the Kingdom History:Complete Biblical/Spiritual Interpretation of History from the Resurrection through the Invasion of Magog (Rev 20:8; Ezek 38), through the 20th Century "Season of Satan" (Rev 20:3) .
In connection with unbiblical internationalism which is inter-relgionism, it is with sardonic condescension that I observe the promotion of the New International Version (NIV) by all the host of, so called, “New Testament” (counterfeit) Churches. This is, no doubt, done for the sake of the name. Conversely, it is difficult to get the New American Standard Bible (NASB). These two versions are nearly identical, except that the NASB has more, and better footnotes – which means that for the sake of the name(s) the false teachers sacrifice content. Again, for the sake of Political Correctness, and the concomitant mind control, the “Baal Priests” choose to elevate a version of lesser quality. (Baal Priests endeavor to “sanctify” whatever the human government or Antichrist "Power of the Air" (Eph 2:2) (publishers) want for society – more on this, later.)